So we are talking about commitments and how people use the way you
handle your commitments to determine their judgement of you and your
overall value to them. It seems logical then, that we discuss what the
most likely possibilities for how you can handle your commitments.
The
first thing that comes to mind is that you can commit to whatever
anyone asks you to do, even if you have no intention of actually doing
it. This is one of the worst possible ways of handling things. It
doesn't start out seeming that way though. In the beginning people will
think you are awesome because you agree to all kinds of different things
that need doing. And they "say man won't it be awesome to have all
these things done! " But, then as time passes and people see that your
words and your deeds do not meet up, they may start to get angry that
you don't do the things that you say you will. Worse yet, if you are
consciously, making agreements that you have no intention of keeping you
are lying directly to the people that you are making those agreements
with. Isn't lying intentionally telling someone something that you know
is not true? So this option makes you an unreliable liar.
Then
there is the absolute opposite end of the spectrum. You do not want to
make commitments that you are not going to keep, so you decide not to
make any commitments at all. And at first, this seems like it might be a
good idea. I mean at the very least you are not lying about what you
are going to do. You just aren't declaring anything. The problem here
is that no one can count on you for anything at all. You might be on
time, you might not, if you bother to even show up. You might pay your
bills, you might not. You might shop, read a new book or watch the
neighbor's kids, or you might not. Nobody has any way of knowing what
you will or will not do. So you aren't a liar, but you are still
unreliable and can't be trusted to do anything without supervision.
Those
are the main extremes. Now we start moving towards the center. This
next option is done a lot by nice people that are afraid to upset others
around them. You can commit to everything that people ask of you, with
every intention of keeping all of the commitments that you make. From my
experience this is the most common mishandling of commitment. Again, at
first, this doesn't seem like a problem because you haven't made
that many commitments and things are manageable. You can keep all of
your commitments at once. But, as time goes on and people see how good
you are at keeping commitments they ask more and more of you. You have
value to them as a person and they want more. This makes you feel good
so you make more and more commitments with more and more people. That's
where the problem comes in, over committing. Regardless of what you do,
there is only so much time in a day. You agree to everything that is
asked of you and to help make sure things get done you prioritize the
commitments and do them from most important to least. What ends up
happening, since you have made such an overwhelming amount of
commitments, is that you get the big ones done(or mostly done) but there
just isn't time for you to do all of them. AND as time goes on, you
make even more commitments and a higher and higher percentage of them
goes undone. This causes a couple of problems. One, your value to other
people plummets because you are unreliable, untrustworthy and some
people may start to think you are the liar from the first example. Also
all kinds of problems tend to happen within yourself, such as guilt from
your word being constantly broken. You may become overwhelmed and even
depressed from all the work you have created for yourself. Or, you may
develop self worth issues from the constant inability to do what you
say.
Join me tomorrow where we will finish up the not so good options and talk about how you should handle your commitments.
No comments:
Post a Comment